Selected Essays
Edited by
Nyanaponika
Thera
Book Publication No. 413
Copyright
©
Kandy, Buddhist Publication Society, (1975, 1990, 2003)
BPS
Online Edition © (2006)
Digital
Transcription Source: Buddhist
Publication Society
For
free distribution. This work may be republished, reformatted, reprinted
and redistributed
in any medium. However, any such republication and redistribution is to
be made available
to the public on a free and unrestricted basis and translations and
other derivative works
are to be clearly marked as such.
Contents:
Introduction:
Kamma and Its Fruit
Kamma—or,
in its Sanskrit form, karma—is the
Buddhist conception of action as a force which shapes and transforms
human destiny. Often misunderstood as an occult power or as an
inescapable fate, kamma as taught by the Buddha is in actuality nothing
other than our own will or volition coming to expression in concrete
action. The Buddhist doctrine of kamma thus places ultimate
responsibility for human destiny in our own hands. It reveals to us how
our ethical choices and actions can become either a cause of pain and
bondage or a means to spiritual freedom.
In
this book, five practising Buddhists, all with modern
backgrounds, offer their reflections on the significance of kamma and
its relations to ethics, spiritual practice, and philosophical
understanding.
Action
Francis
Story
Kamma
is simply action, a "deed." Actions are
performed in three ways: by body, mind and speech. Every action of
importance is performed because there is desire for a result;
it
has an aim, an objective. One wishes for something specific to happen
as the result of it. This desire, no matter how mild it may be, is a
form of craving. It expresses the thirst (ta.nhaa) for
existence and for action. To exist is to act, on one level or another.
Organic existence consists of chemical action; psychic existence
consists of mental action. So existence and action are inseparable.
But
some actions, those in which mind is involved, are bound to have
intention. This is expressed by the Pali word cetanaa,
volition, which is one of the mental properties. There is another word,
chanda, which
stands for wishing, desiring a result. These words all express some
kind of desire. And some form of desire is behind practically every
activity of life. Therefore "to live" and "to desire" are one and the
same thing. (There is one ultimate exception to this statement, which
we shall come to later. It is that of the Arahat.)
An
action (kamma) is morally unwholesome when it is
motivated by the forms of craving that are associated with greed,
hatred and delusion (lobha, dosa, moha). It
is morally
wholesome (in ordinary language, good) when it is motivated by the
opposite factors, disinterestedness (greedlessness), amity and wisdom.
An act so motivated is prompted by "intention" rather than "craving."
Yet in every act of craving, intention is included. It is that which
gives direction and form to the deed.
Now,
each deed performed with intention is a creative act. By
reason of the will behind it, it constitutes a force. It is a force
analogous to the other great unseen, yet physical, forces that move the
universe. By our thoughts, words and deeds we create our world from
moment to moment in the endless process of change. We also create our
"selves." That is to say, we mould our changing personality as we go
along by the accumulation of such thoughts, words and deeds. It is the
accretion of these, and the preponderance of one kind over another,
that determines what we shall become, in this life and in subsequent
ones.
In
thus creating our personality, we create also the
conditions in which it functions. In other words, we create also the
kind of world we are to live in. The mind, therefore, is master of the
world. As a man’s mind is, so is his
cosmos.
Kamma,
then, as the product of the mind, is the true
and only real force in the life-continuum, the flux of coming-to-be.
From this we come to understand that it is the residue of mental force
which from the point of death kindles a new birth. It is the only
actual link between one life ("reincarnation") and another. And since
the process is a continuous one, it is the last kammic thought-moment
at the point of death that forms the rebirth-linking
consciousness—the kamma that reproduces. Other kamma, good or
bad, will
come into operation at some later stage, when external conditions are
favourable for its ripening. The force of weak kamma may be suspended
for a long time by the interposition of a stronger kamma. Some kinds of
kamma may even be inoperative; but this never happens with very strong
or weighty kamma. As a general principle, all kamma bears some kind of
fruit sooner or later.
Each
individual’s kamma is his own personal act, its
results his own personal inheritance. He alone has complete command
over his actions, no matter to what degree others may try to force him.
Yet an unwholesome deed done under strong compulsion does not have
quite the same force as one performed voluntarily. Under threat of
torture or of death a man may be compelled to torture or kill someone
else. In such a case it may be believed that the gravity of his kamma
is not so severe as it would be had he deliberately chosen to act in
such a way. The heaviest moral responsibility rests with those who have
forced him to the action. But in the ultimate sense he still must bear
some responsibility, for he could in the most extreme case avoid
harming another by choosing to suffer torture or death himself.
This
brings us to the question of collective kamma. As
we have seen, each man’s kamma is his own individual
experience. No one
can interfere with the kamma of another beyond a certain point;
therefore no one can intervene to alter the results of personal kamma.
Yet it often happens that numbers of people are associated in the same
kind of actions, and share the same kind of thoughts; they become
closely involved with one another; they influence one another. Mass
psychology produces mass kamma. Therefore all such people are likely to
form the same pattern of kamma. It may result in their being associated
with one another through a number of lives, and in their sharing much
the same kind of experiences. "Collective kamma" is simply the
aggregate of individual kammas, just as a crowd is an aggregate of
individuals.
It
is in fact this kind of mass kamma that produces
different kinds of worlds—the world we live in, the states of
greater
suffering and the states of relative happiness. Each being inhabits the
kind of cosmic construction for which he has fitted himself. It is his
kamma, and the kamma of beings like himself, that has created it. This
is how it comes about that in multidimensional space-time there are
many lokas—many worlds and modes of
being. Each one represents
a particular type of consciousness, the result of kamma. The mind is
confined only by the boundaries it erects itself.
The
results of kamma are called vipaaka, "the
ripening." These terms, kamma and vipaaka,
and the ideas they stand for, must not be confused. Vipaaka is
predetermined (by ourselves) by previous kamma. But kamma itself in the
ultimate sense (that is, when resisting all external pressures and
built-up tendencies) is the product of choice and
free will:
between wholesome and unwholesome deeds, good or bad actions. Hence the
Buddha said: "Intention constitutes kamma." Without intention a deed is
sterile; it produces no reaction of moral significance. One
reservation, however, is here required; if a deed done in "culpable
negligence" proves harmful to
others, the lack of mindfulness, circumspection or consideration shown
will constitute unwholesome kamma and will have its vipaaka. Though the
harm done was not "intended," i.e. the deed was not motivated by hate,
yet there was present another "unwholesome root," delusion (moha),
which includes, for instance, irresponsible
thoughtlessness.
Kamma
is action; vipaaka is result. Therefore kamma
is the active principle; vipaaka is the passive mode of coming-to-be.
People believe in predeterminism, fatalism, merely because they see
results, but do not see causes. In the process of dependent origination
(pa.ticca-samuppaada) both causes and effects
are shown in their proper relationship.
A
person may be born deaf, dumb and blind. That is
the consequence of some unwholesome kamma which manifested or presented
itself to his consciousness in the last thought-moment of his previous
death. Throughout life he may have to suffer the consequences (vipaaka)
of that deed, whatever it may have been. But that fact does not prevent
him from forming fresh kamma of a wholesome type to restore the balance
in his next life. Furthermore, by the aid of some good kamma from the
past, together with strong effort and favourable circumstances in the
present life (which of course includes the compassionate help of
others), the full effects of his bad kamma may be mitigated even here
and now.
Cases
of this kind are seen everywhere, where people
have overcome to a great extent the most formidable handicaps. The
result is that they have turned even the bad vipaaka to profit for
themselves and others. One outstanding example of this is the famous
Dr. Helen Keller. But this calls for almost superhuman courage and
will-power. Most people in similar circumstances remain passive
sufferers of the effects of their bad deeds until those effects are
exhausted. Thus it has to be in the case of those born mentally
defective or in the lower states of suffering. Having scarcely any
capacity for the exercise of free will, they are subject entirely to
predeterminism until the bad vipaaka has run its course.
So,
by acknowledging some element of predeterminism, yet at the same time
maintaining the ultimate
ascendancy of will, Buddhism resolves a moral problem which otherwise
seems insoluble. Part of the personality, and the conditions in which
it exists, are predetermined by the deeds and the total personality of
the past; but in the final analysis the mind is able to free itself
from the bondage of past personality-construction and launch out in a
fresh direction.
Now,
we have seen that the three roots of
unwholesome actions—greed, hatred and
delusion—produce bad results; the
three roots of wholesome actions—disinterestedness, amity and
wisdom—produce good results. Actions which are performed
automatically
or unconsciously, or are incidental to some other action having an
entirely different objective, do not produce results beyond their
immediate mechanical consequences. If one treads on an insect in the
dark one is not morally responsible for its death. One has been merely
an unconscious instrument of the insect’s own kamma in
producing its
death.
But
while there is a large class of actions of the
last type, which cannot be avoided, the more important actions in
everyone’s life are dominated by one or other of these six
psychological roots, wholesome and unwholesome. Even where a life is
physically inactive, the thoughts are at work; they are producing
kamma. Cultivation of the mind therefore consists in removing (not
suppressing) unwholesome mental states and substituting wholesome ones.
Modern civilisation develops by suppressing unwholesome (the
"anti-social") instincts. Consequently they break out from time to time
in unwholesome eruptions. A war breaks out and the homicidal maniac
comes into his own: murder is made praiseworthy. Buddhism, on the other
hand, aims at removing the unwholesome
mental elements. For this, the special techniques of meditation (bhaavanaa)
are necessary.
Good
kamma is the product of wholesome states of
mind. And to be certain of this, it is essential to gain an
understanding of the states of consciousness and one’s most
secret
motives. Unless this is done, it is next to impossible to cultivate
exclusively wholesome actions, because in every human consciousness
there is a complex of hidden motivations. They are hidden because we do
not wish to acknowledge them. In every human being there is a built-in
defence mechanism that prevents him from seeing himself too clearly. If
he should happen to be confronted with his subconscious mind too
suddenly he may receive an unpleasant psychological shock. His
carefully constructed image of himself is rudely shattered. He is
appalled by the crudity, the unsuspected savagery, of his real
motivations.
The
keen and energetic social worker may find that
he is really actuated by a desire to push other people around, to tell
them what is best for them and to force them to do his will. The
professional humanitarian, always championing the underdog, may find to
his distress that his outbursts of high moral indignation at the
injustices of society are nothing more than an expression of his real
hatred of other humans, made respectable to himself and others by the
guise of concern for the victims of society. Or each may be
compensating for hidden defects in his own personality. All these facts
are well known to present-day psychologists; but how many people submit
themselves to the analyst’s probings? Buddhism teaches us to
do it for
ourselves, and to make ourselves immune to unpleasant or shocking
revelations by acknowledging beforehand that there is no immutable
personality, no "self" to be either admired or deplored.
An
action (kamma), once it is performed, is finished so far as its actual
performance is concerned. It is also irreversible.
The moving finger writes, and
having writ
Moves on; nor all your piety nor wit
Can lure it back to cancel half a line—
Nor all your tears wash out one word of it.
Edward
Fitzgerald: The Rubaiyyat of
Omar Khayyam
The
moving finger is no mystery to one who
understands kamma and vipaaka. Ask not whose finger writes upon the
wall. It is thine own.
What
remains of the action is its potential, the
inevitability of its result. It is a force released into the stream of
time, and in time it must have its fruition. And when, for good or ill,
it has fructified, like all else its force must pass away—and
then the
kamma and the vipaaka alike are no more. But as the old kammas die, new
ones are created—every moment of every waking hour. So the
life-process, involved in suffering, is carried on. It is borne along
on the current of craving. It is in its essence nothing but that
craving, that desire—the desire that takes many forms, is
insatiable,
is self-renewing. As many-formed as Proteus; as undying as the phoenix.
But
when there comes the will to end desire, a
change takes place. The mind that craved gratification in the fields of
sense now turns away. Another desire, other than that of the senses,
gathers power and momentum. It is the desire for cessation, for peace,
for the end of pain and sorrow. The desire for Nibbaana.
Now
this desire is incompatible with all other
desires. Therefore, if it becomes strong enough it kills all other
desires. Gradually they fade out; first the grosser cravings springing
from the three immoral roots; then the higher desires; then the
attachments, all wilt and fade out, extinguished by the one
overmastering desire for Nibbaana.
And
as they wilt and fade out, and no more
result-producing actions take their place, so the current of the
life-continuum dries up. Unwholesome actions cannot be performed,
because their roots have withered away; there is no more basis for
them. The wholesome deeds in their turn become sterile; since they are
not motivated by desire they do not project any force into the future.
In the end there is no craving force left to produce another birth.
Everything has been swallowed up by the desire for the extinction of
desire.
And
when the object of that desire is gained, can it
any longer be a desire? Does a man continue to long for what he has
already got? The last desire of all is not self-renewing; it is
self-destroying. For in its fulfilment is its own death. Nibbaana is
attained.
Therefore
the Buddha said, "For the final cessation of suffering, all
kamma, wholesome and unwholesome, must be transcended, must be
abandoned. Putting aside good and evil, one attains Nibbaana. There is
no other way."
The
Arahat lives then only experiencing the residuum
of his life-span. And when that last remaining impetus comes to an end
the aggregates of his personality come to an end too, never to be
reconstructed, never to be replaced. In their continual renewal there
was suffering; now there is release. In their coming together there was
illusion—the illusion of self. Now there is Reality.
And
Reality is beyond conception.
Kamma
and Causality
Francis
Story
"Does
everything happen in our lives according to
kamma?" This question is not one that can be answered by a plain
affirmation or denial, since it involves the whole question of
free-will against determinism, or, in familiar language, "fatalism."
The nearest that can be given to a simple answer is to say that most of
the major circumstances and events of life are conditioned by kamma,
but not all.
If
everything, down to the minutest detail, were
pre-conditioned either by kamma or by the physical laws of the
universe, there would be no room in the pattern of strict causality for
the functioning of free-will. It would therefore be impossible for us
to free ourselves from the mechanism of cause and effect; it would be
impossible to attain Nibbaana.
In
the sphere of everyday events and the incidents
of life such as sickness, accidents and such common experiences, every
effect requires more than one cause to bring it about, and kamma is in
most cases the predisposing factor which enables the external
influences to combine and produce a given result. In the case of
situations that involve a moral choice, the situation itself is the
product of past kamma, but the individual’s reaction to it is
a free
play of will and intention. For example, a man, as the result of
previous unwholesome (akusala) kamma either in the
present life
or some past birth, may find himself in a situation of desperate
poverty in which he is sorely tempted to steal, commit a robbery, or in
some other way carry into the future the unwholesome actions of the
past. This is a situation with a moral content, because it involves the
subject in a nexus of ethical potentials. Here his own freedom of
choice comes into play; he has the alternative of choosing further
hardship rather than succumb to the temptation of crime.
In
the pa.ticca-samuppaada, the cycle of
dependent origination, the factors belonging to previous births, that
is, ignorance and the actions conditioned by it, are summarised as the
kamma-process of the past. This kamma produces consciousness,
name-and-form, sense-perception fields, contact and sensation as its
resultants, and this is known as the present effect. Thus the physical
and mental make-up (naama-ruupa) is the
manifestation of past
kamma operating in the present, as also are the phenomena cognised and
experienced through the channels of sense. But running along with this
is another current of action, that which is controlled by the will, and
this is known as the present volitional activity; it is the counterpart
in the present of the kamma-process of the past. It governs the factors
of craving, grasping and becoming.
This
means, in effect, that the current of
"becoming" which has its source in past kamma, at the point where it
manifests as individual reaction—as for example in the degree
of
craving engendered as the result of pleasurable
sensation—comes under
the control of the will, so that while the subject has no further
control over the situations in which he finds himself, having himself
created them in the past, he yet has a subjective control over his
response to them, and it is out of this that he creates the conditions
of his future. The present volitional activity then takes effect in the
form of future resultants, and these future resultants are the
counterpart in the future of the kammic resultants of the present. In
an exactly similar way it dominates the future birth-state and
conditions, which in the pa.ticca-samuppaada are
expressed as
arising, old age and death, etc. The entire cycle implies a dynamic
progression in which the state conditioned by past actions is at the
same time the womb of present actions and their future results.
Kamma
is not only an integral law of the process of
becoming; it is itself that process, and the phenomenal personality is
but the present manifestation of its activity. The Christian axiom of
"hating the sin but loving the sinner" is meaningless from the Buddhist
standpoint. There is action, but no performer of the action; the "sin"
and the "sinner" cannot be dissociated; we are our actions, and nothing
apart from them.
Modes of Conditioning
The
conditioned nature of all mental and physical phenomena is analysed
under twenty-four heads, called in Pali paccaya
(modes of conditioning). Each of the twenty-four paccayas is
a contributing factor to the arising of conditioned things. The
thirteenth mode is kamma-paccaya, and
stands for the past actions which form the base, or condition, of
something arising later. The six sense organs and fields of
sense-cognition—that is, the physical organs of sight,
hearing, smell,
taste, touch and mental awareness—which, as we have seen,
arise at
birth in association with name-and-form, provide the condition-base for
the arising of subsequent consciousness, and hence for the mental
reactions following upon it. But here it should be noted that although
kamma as volition is associated with the mental phenomena that have
arisen, the phenomena themselves are not kamma-results. The fourteenth
mode is kamma-result condition, or vipaaka, and
stands as a
condition by way of kamma-result to the mental and physical phenomena
by establishing the requisite base in the five fields of
sense-consciousness.
That
there are events that come about through causes
other than kamma is demonstrable by natural laws. If it were not so, to
try to avoid or cure sickness would be useless. If there is a
predisposition to a certain disease through past kamma, and the
physical conditions to produce the disease are also present, the
disease will arise. But it may also come about that all the physical
conditions are present, but, through the absence of the
kamma-condition, the disease does not arise; or that, with the presence
of the physical causes the disease arises even in the absence of a
kamma condition. A philosophical distinction is therefore to be made
between those diseases which are the result of kamma and those which
are produced solely by physical conditions; but since it is impossible
to distinguish between them without a knowledge of past births, all
diseases must be treated as though they are produced by merely physical
causes. When the Buddha was attacked by Devadatta and was wounded in
the foot by a stone, he was able to explain that the injury was the
result of some violence committed in a previous life plus the action of
Devadatta which enabled the kamma to take effect. Similarly, the
violent death of Moggallaana Thera was the combined result of his kamma
and the murderous intention of the rival ascetics whose action provided
the necessary external cause to bring it about.
Causality
The
process of causality, of which kamma and
vipaaka are only one action-result aspect, is a cosmic, universal
interplay of forces. Concerning the question of free-will in a
causally-conditioned universe, the view of reality presented by Henri
Bergson, which when it was postulated was new to the West, throws
considerable light on the Buddhist concept. Life, says Bergson, is an
unceasing becoming, which preserves the past and creates the future.
The solid things which seem to be stable and to endure, which seem to
resist this flowing, which seem more real than the flowing, are
periods, cuts across the flowing, views that our mind takes of the
living reality of which it is a part, in which it lives and moves,
views of the reality prescribed and limited by the needs of its
particular activity.
Here
we have a Western interpretation of avijjaa
(ignorance) —" views of the reality prescribed and limited by
the needs of its particular activity"—and of anicca,
the unceasing becoming, the principle of change and
impermanence. Bergson also includes in his system anattaa
(no-self), for in this process of unceasing change there is the change
only—no "thing" that changes. So, says Bergson, when we
regard our
action as a chain of complementary parts linked together, each action
so viewed is rigidly conditioned, yet when we regard our whole
life-current as one and indivisible, it may be free. So also with the
life-current which we may take to be the reality of the universe; when
we view it in its detail as the intellect presents it to us, it appears
as an order of real conditioning, each separate state having its ground
in an antecedent state, yet as a whole, as the living impulse (kamma),
it is free and creative. We are free, says Bergson, when our acts
spring from our whole personality, when they express that personality.
These acts are not unconditioned, but the conditions are not external;
they are in our character, which is ourself. In other and Buddhist
words, our sa"nkhaara, or kamma-formation of the
past, is the personality, and that is conditioned by nothing but our
own volition, or cetanaa.
Bergson
details an elaborate philosophy of space and
time to give actuality to this dynamic view, which he calls "Creative
Evolution," and his general conclusion is that the question of
free-will against determinism is wrongly postulated; the problem, like
the indeterminate questions of Buddhism, cannot be answered because it
is itself a product of that peculiar infirmity, that "special view of
reality prescribed and limited by the needs of a particular activity,"
which in Buddhism is called avijjaa, the primal
nescience.
The
concept of causality in the world of physics has
undergone modifications of a significant order in the light of quantum
physics and the increase of our knowledge regarding the atomic
structure of matter. Briefly the present position may be stated thus:
while it is possible to predict quantitatively the future states of
great numbers of atomic units, it is not possible to pre-determine the
state or position of any one particular atom. There is a margin of
latitude for the behaviour of the individual unit which is not given to
the mass as a whole. In human terms, it may be possible to predict from
the course of events that a certain nation, Gondalia, will be at war by
a certain date; but it is not possible to predict of any individual
Gondalian that he will be actively participating in the war. He may be
a conscientious objector, outside the war by his own decision; or he
may be physically disqualified, outside the war because of conditions
over which he has no control. We may say, "Gondalia will be at war,"
but not "That Gondalian will be in the war." On the other hand, if we
know that one particular Gondalian is not physically fit we may say
confidently that he will not be in the war; the element we cannot
predict with any degree of certainty is the free-will of the Gondalian
individual, which may make of him a chauvinist and national Gondalian
hero, or a pacifist and inmate of a concentration camp.
How Kamma Operates
Coming
to the details of the ways in which kamma operates, it must be
understood that by kamma is meant volitional action only. Cetanaaha.m
bhikkhave kamma.m vadaami—"
Volition, intention, O bhikkhus, is what I call kamma," is the
definition given by the Buddha. Greed, hatred and delusion are the
roots of unwholesome kamma; unselfishness, amity and wisdom are the
roots of wholesome kamma. As the seed that is sown, so must be the tree
and the fruit of the tree; from an impure mind and intention, only
impure thoughts, words and deeds can issue; from such impure thoughts,
words and deeds only evil consequences can result.
The
results themselves may come about in the same lifetime; when this
happens it is called di.t.thadhamma-vedaniiya-kamma, and
the line of causality between action and result is often clearly
traceable, as in the case of crime which is followed by punishment.
Actions which bear their results in the next birth are called upapajja-vedaniiya-kamma,
and
it frequently happens that people who remember their previous life
remember also the kamma which has produced their present conditions.
Those
actions which ripen in successive births are known as aparaapariya-vedaniiya-kamma;
these
are the actions which have, by continual practice, become habitual, and
tend to take effect over and over again in successive lives. The
repetition condition (aasevana-paccaya) is
the twelfth of the twenty-four paccayas, and
relates to that kamma-consciousness in which the preceding
impulse-moments (javana-citta) are
a condition by way of repetition to all the succeeding ones. This is
known to modern psychology as a habit-formation, and is a very strong
conditioning factor of mind and character. Buddhism urges the continual
repetition of good actions, deeds of mettaa and
charity, and
the continual dwelling of the mind on good and elevating subjects, such
as the qualities of the Buddha, Dhamma and Sangha, in order to
establish a strong habit-formation along good and beneficial lines.
The
three kinds of kamma described above, however,
may be without any resultants if the other conditions necessary for the
arising of the kamma-result are lacking. Rebirth among inferior orders
of beings, for instance, will prevent or delay the beneficial results
of a habitual kamma. There is also counteractive kamma
which, if it is stronger than they, will inhibit their fruition. Kamma
which is thus prevented from taking effect is called
ahosi-kamma. Just
as there are events which occur without kamma as a cause, so there are
actions which, as potentials, remain unrealised. These actions,
however, are usually the weak and relatively unimportant ones, actions
not prompted by any strong impulse and carrying with them little moral
significance.
Functionally,
the various kinds of kamma operate according to four classifications.
The first is generative kamma (janaka-kamma)
which produces the five aggregate complex of name-and-form at birth and
through all the stages of its arising during the life-continuum. The
second category is that of sustaining kamma
(upatthambhaka-kamma), which
is void of kamma-results and is only capable of sustaining
kamma-resultants that have already come into being. In the third
category comes counteractive kamma (upapii.laka-kamma),
which by reason of its moral or immoral force suppresses other
kamma-results and delays or prevents their arising. Last in this
classification according to functions comes destructive kamma
(upacchedaka-kamma); this
is kamma of such potency that it utterly destroys the influence of
weaker kamma and substitutes its own kamma-results. It may be strong
enough to cut short the life-span so that it is destructive kamma in
the literal sense.
The
light and insignificant actions which we perform
in the course of our daily lives have their results, but they are not
dominant factors unless they become part of a habit-formation.
Important actions which become habitual, either wholesome or
unwholesome, are known as bahula-kamma, and their
effects take
precedence over those of actions which are morally insignificant or
rarely performed. Those actions which are rooted in a very strong moral
or immoral impulse, and take a drastic form, are known as garuka-kamma;
they also tend to fall into the di.t.thadhamma-vedaniiya-kamma
class and take effect in the same lifetime, or else in the next
existence. Such actions are: drawing the blood of a Buddha, the murder
of an Arahat, the killing of parents, and attempts to disrupt the
Sangha.1 Although these are
the chief
demeritorious actions, there are many others of lesser weight which
bear results in the next birth in the absence of garuka-kamma.
The same applies to good garuka-kamma.
Di.t.thadhamma-vedaniiya-kamma
provides us
with data for studying the operation of the law of cause and effect
objectively. In the usual course of things crime brings its own
consequences in the same lifetime, by a clearly traceable sequence of
events, but this does not invariably happen. For a crime to receive its
due punishment a complicated machinery of causes has to be brought into
operation. First there has to be the act of crime, the kamma. Its
punishment then depends upon the existence of criminal laws, of a
police force, of the circumstances which enable the criminal to be
detected, and many subsidiary factors. It is only when all these
combine that the crime receives its due punishment in the same
lifetime. If the external factors are missing, the kamma alone will not
bring about its consequences immediately, and we say the criminal has
gone unpunished.
This,
however, is not the case; sooner or later
either in the same lifetime or a subsequent one, circumstances will
link together, albeit indirectly, and give an opportunity for the kamma
to produce its results. Hence from the Buddhist standpoint the question
of capital punishment rests not on considerations of mercy to the
murderer, which must always be a source of contention since mercy to a
criminal implies a social injustice to the victim and lack of
protection to potential victims; it rests on a consideration of the
kamma-resultants to those who are instrumental in punishing him with
death, since it is kamma of the worst order to kill or cause another to
take life.
It
is not possible here to enter into a discussion
of the moral difference between the action of one who kills another
from greed or anger and one who carries out a sentence of death in the
course of his duties to society. That there is a difference cannot be
doubted, yet for Buddhist psychology it is clear that no act of killing
can be accomplished without the arising of a hate-impulse in the mind.
To take life quite disinterestedly, as advocated in the Bhagavad
Gita, is
a psy-chological impossibility; there must, in any case, be desire for
the accomplishment of the act, or the act itself could never be carried
out. This applies to every action except those performed by the Arahat.
Since there is no "unchanging Atman" no distinction can be made between
the deed and the doer.
Rebirth
The
mode, circumstances and nature of the next birth are conditioned by
what is known as the death-proximate kamma (mara.naasanna-kamma),
which is the volition, wholesome or unwholesome, that
is present immediately before death. With this is associated the pa.tisandhi-vi~n~naa.na
or
connecting consciousness between one manifestation and another. At the
moment just preceding death, the death-proximate kamma may take the
form of a reflex of some good or bad deed performed during the dying
person’s life. This sometimes presents itself to the
consciousness as a
symbol, like the dream symbols of Freudian psychology. It may bring
with it an indication of the future existence, a glimpse of the realm (loka)
in which rebirth is about to take place. It is due to the arising of
some unwholesome consciousness from past kamma that the dying sometimes
exhibit fear, while others, experiencing wholesome death-proximate
kamma, die with a smile on their lips, seeing themselves welcomed by
celestial beings or their friends who have passed away before them.
Everyone who has been present at death beds can recall examples of both
kinds.
When
none of these kamma-manifestations is present,
however, as with those who die in a state of complete unconsciousness,
the next birth is determined by what is called reserved kamma
(ka.tattaa-kamma). This
is the automatic result of whatever kamma of the past is strongest, be
it good or bad, and has not yet borne fruit or exhausted its force.
This may be weighty or habitual kamma.
Heedfulness in Dying and When
Living
The
importance of keeping the consciousness
active and faculties alert up to the moment of death is stressed in
Buddhist psychology. Part of the benefit of mara.naanussati, the
meditation on death, is that it enables
one to approach the thought of death undismayed, in full possession of
one’s faculties and with control of the mental impulses.
Instead of
charging us to remember our sins and approach death in fear, Buddhism
instructs us to call to mind our good actions, put aside terror and
meet death with the calm confidence of one whose destiny is under his
own control. It is a positive attitude in place of the negative and
depressing mental state encouraged by other religions. Modern
psychology advises the cultivation of such an optimistic attitude
throughout life. Buddhism goes further, and shows it to be a necessary
safeguard when we stand on the threshold of a new existence.
It
has already been said that those who are able to
remember previous lives can trace the course of kamma and vipaaka from
one birth to another. They are the only people who are in a position to
differentiate clearly between the events that occur because of kamma
and those that are caused by external agencies. It is certain, however,
that predominantly good kamma will save us from most of the slings and
arrows of outrageous fortune, or help us to rise above whatever
obstacles are set in our path. The need
for human endeavour is always present, for
in the very enjoyment of the fruits of good kamma we are generating a
new series of actions to bear their own results in the future.
It
cannot be too often or too emphatically repeated
that the true understanding of the law of kamma is the absolute
opposite of fatalism. The man who is born to riches on account of his
past deeds of charity cannot afford to rest on his laurels. He is like
a man with a substantial bank balance; he may either live on his
capital until he exhausts it, which is foolish, or he can use it as an
investment and increase it. The only investment we can take with us out
of this life into the next is good kamma; it therefore behooves every
man who is, in the common phrase, "blessed" with riches, to use those
riches wisely in doing good.
If
everyone understood the law of kamma there would
be an end to the greed of the rich and the envy of the poor. Every man
would strive to give away as much as he could in charity—or
at least
spend his money on projects beneficial to mankind. On the other hand
there would be no burning feeling of injustice on the part of the
"have-nots," since they would recognise that their condition is due to
their own past kamma, while at the same time its crushing effects would
be alleviated by the generosity and social conscience of the rich. The
result would be a co-operative scheme of sharing, in which both would
prosper.
This
is
the practical plan of living that Buddhism suggests to us; it is sane,
ethical and inspiring, and it is the one answer that a free world can
make to the anti-religious materialistic ideologies. To put it into
practice would be the greatest step forward in mankind’s
social
as well as spiritual progress, and one that must be made if we are to
save our civilisation from the terrible consequences of greed, hatred
and delusion. It is not enough to have a knowledge of the law of kamma:
it must be used as applied science in the ordering of personal and
national life for the realization of a happier, more stable and more
regulated phase of human history.
Action and Reaction in
Buddhist Teachings
Leonard
A. Bullen
The
whole
universe is governed by law, and the unbroken sequence of action and
reaction occurs in mental and moral operations just as strictly as in
physical processes. In consequence, the Buddha-doctrine emphasizes that
morally skilful thought, speech and action bring happiness to the doer
at some time or other, while in the same way activities which are
morally unskilful give rise to future suffering. That which determines
the moral skill of an activity—whether it be in thought,
speech
or bodily action—is the volition or mental purpose which
motivates it. Where it is based on generosity, on goodwill, or on
selfless motives, it is morally skilful, whereas when the purpose which
motivates it springs from greed, hatred or delusion it is regarded as
morally unskilful.
Thus the Buddha-doctrine stresses the need for developing a clear
comprehension of the purpose behind every activity at every level, at
the levels of thought, of speech and of bodily action. Some of these
activities build up forces within the mind which eventually lead to an
increase in well-being, while others, being aimless or unskilful,
result in sorrow or frustration. Thus, if you take on almost any form
of mental culture, one of your most important aims should be to
comprehend more clearly the ultimate purpose behind all these
activities.
In this scientific and technological age, you are familiar with the
idea that physical effects have causes, that these effects also become
causes in their turn, and that in the ordinary course of events there
is no room for chance or luck. But while you accept this invariable
sequence of action and reaction in the material realm, you
don’t
always recognize it in the moral sphere. The Buddha-doctrine affirms,
however, that the law of cause and effect applies just as invariably
and just as exactly in the moral sphere as it does in the physical
realm. This doctrine emphasizes the fact that everything in the
universe acts according to various laws, and that no being in the
universe can set aside or invalidate these laws. It defines five
systems of laws (pa~nca-niyaama).
The first of these is the law-system which concerns the rise and
fall—that is, the growth and decay—of physical
phenomena
under the action of heat. Second, there is the group of laws relating
to the generation or growth of vegetation and of the bodies of living
beings. The third law-system relates to mental action and reaction,
that is, to the action of the will and its results in terms of
happiness and suffering. Fourth, there are the various laws governing
the processes of the mind, the laws which are studied and applied by
psychologists. Finally, the fifth law-system groups together the
multiplicity of laws which relate to physical and mental phenomena in
general which are not embraced by the other systems of laws.
Of these five groups, you’ll find that it is the third
law-system
that interests us in the present context. This, the law-system
governing the action of the will and its consequences, is only one of
the five groups of laws, but it is the one that is most directly
connected with your own happiness and sorrow, your own pains and
pleasures.
The original Buddhist terms that are sometimes translated as moral and
immoral, or as good and bad, may also be rendered as wholesome and
unwholesome. However, the terms skilful and unskilful are often used to
convey the meanings of the original terms, for a moral or wholesome
action is considered to be skilful because it eventually brings
enjoyment as a result; an immoral or unwholesome action, since in time
it brings suffering to the doer, is regarded as unskilful.
Any activity—morally good or otherwise—produces, of
course,
its normal physical result. If you throw a stone through a window it
will break the window, whether the motivation behind it be morally
skilful or otherwise. The broken window is the normal physical result
of the stone-throwing action.
But assuming that the action is motivated by some morally unskilful
volition (such as hatred) there will be a mental effect as well. The
exercise of hatred will strengthen the hatred which already exists
within the mind just as the exercise of a muscle will strengthen its
own tissues. In consequence, hatred will become a more dominant factor
in your mental make-up.
Now hatred is one of a group of mental factors which lead to suffering.
In some way or other, at some time in the near or distant future, this
mental factor will bring you suffering of some kind. The basic cause of
the suffering is not the action of throwing the stone, but the hatred
or ill-will present in the volitional act of throwing the stone.
Now it is conceivable that the action of throwing the stone through the
window might be motivated, not by hatred, but by some form of goodwill.
You might, for example, use this action as a means of letting air into
a smoke-filled room in a burning house in order to rescue someone in
the room. In such circumstances, the unselfishness you exercise in your
wholesome volitional action would strengthen your existing mental
factor of goodwill, and this strengthened mental factor would
eventually bring you into circumstances that would yield happiness.
Thus a morally skilful will-action brings enjoyment at some future
time, while an unwholesome volition eventuates in suffering. On the
other hand, an action which is not volitional (while of course it gives
rise to normal physical effects) does not produce any effects in terms
of strengthened mind-factors, and no effects in terms of future
happiness and suffering. Where there is no volition there is no moral
or immoral element.
The personal will or volition in its primal form is the urge to live,
the urge to survive as a self and to assert this selfhood. From this
fundamental will to live arise various tendencies, which we know as
urges, instincts, and desires, and which are accompanied by emotions.
In Buddhist psychology, the instincts and desires are all regarded as
manifestations of the fundamental will to live. This will to live, as a
rule, is simply called craving: it is the craving or thirst for
personal existence, the craving to live and survive as a self for
eternity. But the final freedom from unhappiness can be found only by
transcending personal existence.
The thirst for personal existence, rooted as it is in ignorance, is
said to be a primary condition on which all suffering depends. Thus the
ultimate aim of the practising Buddhist is to overcome craving by the
attainment of enlightenment.
This means, of course, to overcome desire, but only insofar as desire
is personal or self-centred. It has been said:
To
start from where we are now and unequivocally let go of every desire
would be to die, and to die is not to solve the problem of living.
Houston Smith
The type of desire to be overcome, then, is what may be called ignorant
desire or irrational desire. To quote again:
The
desires for the basic necessities of life can be satisfied, whereas the
selfish desires of the ego can never be allayed. These do not spring
from the chemistry of the body but are purely mental
constructions—to be more and more, to have more and more:
money,
possessions, power, prestige, love; to outstrip and outshine all
others; to be supreme. It is an impossible dream which, if realized,
would not bring in its train either peace or happiness.
The greedy, the jealous, the envious can never be satisfied because
their dissatisfaction and unhappiness do not spring from any real
deprivation of the essentials of life, but from the defects and
distortions within their character.
Mettaa
From all this you’ll see that in Buddhism the first and last
enemy is considered to be ignorance—ignorance, not in the
sense
of lack of education, but in the sense of lack of the capacity for true
discernment.
You’ll appreciate, too, that the final victory to be won is
the
victory of discernment or enlightenment, and that the principal weapon
in the battle is the weapon of right mindfulness in its various forms.
The personal will, then, is an aspect of the will to live, the blind
thirst for personal existence which, in human life, expresses itself by
way of various instinctive and emotional factors. These collectively
constitute the dynamic elements in mental life.
Buddhist psychology adopts a system of classifying the dynamic
mind-factors which is somewhat different from the classifications
you’ll meet in Western psychology. It includes not only
instinctive elements but also mental habits developed from the
instincts, as well as thought-patterns deliberately cultivated in
opposition to the instincts.
This classification generally appears in Buddhist literature as a list
of fifty active mental factors (in contrast to the receptive mental
factors known as feeling and perception), and together these fifty
constitute the dynamic components of the mind. Some of them are
directly derived from the fundamental urge towards personal survival,
while others are cultivated in opposition to the egotistic tendencies,
but all of them help to determine behaviour. For this reason they can
be conveniently referred to as the fifty determinants.
There is no need to deal here with the determinants in detail. All that
we need to mention in the present context are three which are called
the roots of unskilful will-activity and their opposites, the three
roots of skilful volition.
The three roots of unskilful volition are greed, hatred and delusion,
while the opposite three—generosity, goodwill, and
discernment—are the roots of skilful will-activity.
Such activity may take the form of bodily action, it may take the form
of speech, or it may take the form of thought; but it is the motive
behind the activity, the mental determinant that gives rise to it, that
is all-important.
Thus if you think, speak or act from motives of greed, whether in an
obvious and intense form or in a subtle and disguised way, you thereby
strengthen greed in your mental make-up. On the other hand, when you
act from generosity you thereby strengthen this determinant in your own
mind.
It is the same with hatred and its opposite factor of goodwill. One who
allows himself to become angry or irritable immediately builds up in
his own mind the factor of hatred, whereas when he makes an effort to
be tolerant and patient with irritating people or annoying things he
increases the mental factor of goodwill within his mind.
Again, if you think, speak or act in a self-centred way, you are
allowing yourself to be motivated by delusion, for delusion in the
present context means primarily the delusion of self, together with the
self-deceit and feelings of superiority and inferiority that go along
with it. As a result you become more and more governed by this
delusion, for it becomes a stronger determinant than before.
When, on the other hand, you endeavour to discern the true nature of
the illusory self and to break free from self-deceit, you strengthen
the opposite factor of discernment. Thus discernment—or
non-delusion, as it is often called—becomes a stronger
determinant of your subsequent thought-processes.
Now the morally unskilful determinants that exist as parts of your
mental make-up, as you can see, retard your progress towards the final
liberation; thus we can speak of them as the "retardants."
In the same way, you can see that the morally skilful mind-factors help
you in your progress towards the final liberation; and therefore we can
also call them the "progressants."
You’ll see from this that from the exercise of a particular
determinant there is an immediate effect within the mind. This
immediate effect is a strengthening of that determinant, which of
course makes it easier to arouse it in the future.
However, there is more to it than that. Each of the determinants that
we have been discussing, each of the active or dynamic factors that
help to make up the mind as a whole, can be visualized as an
accumulation of energy within the mind. You can regard each particular
determinant—generosity, for example, on the one hand, or
greed on
the other—as an accumulation of a specific sort of force
within
the mind, and each such force will eventually bring about its own kind
of experience at some time in the future.
This future experience is the result of the original
will-activity—the reaction to the original action. The
volitional
action in the first place causes an accumulation of a specific mental
force, and this force in its turn brings about its reaction in terms of
enjoyment or suffering. The accumulated force, therefore, can be termed
a "reaction-force."
An accumulation of the reaction-force of generosity will at some time
give rise to enjoyment of some kind, just as the accumulation of energy
within an electrical torch battery may at some time give rise to light.
The energy within the battery can give rise to light only when the
conditions are favourable: there must be an electric-light bulb, and
the switch of the torch must be turned on. The current can then flow
through the filament, which then glows with light. In the
process—unless the current is switched off or unless some
replenishment of the battery takes place—the energy will be
eventually completely discharged.
In much the same way, the accumulation of the reaction-force of
generosity can give rise to enjoyment only when the environment
provides suitable conditions; and, until the requisite environmental
conditions come about, the reaction-force remains in storage, so to
speak. When the suitable conditions do eventually appear, this
particular reaction-force will give rise to the enjoyment of happy
experiences, and in the process the accumulation will become less and
less until completely discharged, unless of course it is replenished by
further generosity.
In general, some sort of replenishment may be going on while the
discharge is taking place. If, while you’re enjoying happy
experiences, you continue to exercise your generosity, then the
accumulation of this particular reaction-force will be replenished even
while it is being discharged. It is then like a water-tank from which
you’re drawing off water but which is being replenished by
rain
at the same time.
However, if while enjoying the fruits of previous generous actions you
become selfish and greedy, then your mind is like a water-tank during a
drought: as the water is all drained off and never replenished, so your
accumulation of happiness-producing reaction-force is drained off until
finally discharged.
As with the mind-factor we know as generosity, so with its opposite
determinant, greed. When one gives way to self-desire in any form, the
accumulation of the reaction-force of greed is increased in
one’s
mind. When at some future time the external conditions are suitable,
this accumulation will discharge by way of suffering. During suffering,
one may give way to further adverse states of mind, such as self-pity,
and this will add to the accumulated reaction-force. On the other hand,
one may develop patience and other favourable qualities of mind, and
thus this particular sorrow-producing accumulation will eventually be
fully discharged.
While each type of mind-factor is a particular reaction-force, in
general we can group them into two broad classes—first,
reaction-forces that lead to happiness, and second those that lead to
suffering. Often these are spoken of respectively as merit and demerit,
and thus we say that while one person who has a great stock of merit
will enjoy great happiness in the future, another who has stored up
much demerit will have to endure great suffering at some later time.
The reaction-forces that exist within the mind are stored, so to speak,
below the consciously accessible level of the mind. The subconscious
aspect of the mind, in Buddhist terminology, is called the
life-subcurrent. It is the current of mental energy which exists below
the threshold of consciousness, and it is thus the repository of the
resultants of all past actions and past experiences.
This life-subcurrent may for convenience be called the storehouse of
the residual reaction-forces from all previous will-actions; but you
must not take the idea of a storehouse too literally. The experiences
in our lives are not in any real sense stored anywhere in the same way
that water is stored in a tank, any more than apples are stored in an
apple tree.
You don’t believe, of course, that apples are stored in an
apple
tree. Given the right external conditions of climate, soil, and
nutrition, the forces within the apple tree will cause apples to grow
on its branches; and in the same way, given the right external
conditions, the forces within the life-subcurrent will project or
precipitate experiences in accordance with the nature of these forces.
Wind is not stored somewhere in the air, but under the right conditions
of heat or cold, the air will expand or contract and give rise to wind.
In the same way, fire is not stored in the head of a match, but under
the right conditions of friction the match will give rise to fire.
Again, sound is not stored in a record; but given the necessary
conditions—when placed on a turn table of a
record-player—the formation of the record gives rise to sound.
Thus the experiences of life, together with their corresponding
happiness and suffering, are not stored in a literal sense in the
life-subcurrent, but under the right conditions these events will
develop as the apples develop on the branches of the apple tree.
Thus you can see that no reaction-force can take effect unless there
exist suitable conditions for its operation or discharge. As the
suitable conditions may not arise within your present lifetime, it
follows that you may not reap the enjoyment and suffering resulting
from these activities within your present lifetime.
You can see, then, that at the end of your present lifetime there will
exist many undischarged reaction-forces, and for many of your actions
the appropriate reactions will not have occurred as yet. In other
words, when you die there’ll be an unexpended residue of
reaction-forces both progressant and retardant which have had no
opportunities to discharge during your present lifetime.
What happens to these unexpended or undischarged reaction-forces? When
you die, your body will disintegrate, of course; but the
Buddha-doctrine teaches that various components of the mind survive in
the form of a life-current, a current of mental energy, and that this
current of energy consists of undischarged reaction-forces. This is
what the life-current actually is, an ever-changing stream of
reaction-forces, and at your death this life-current will initiate a
new life and thus bring about the birth of a new being.
The new being is you yourself, being an unbroken continuation of the
life-current. The new being inherits all the
reaction-forces—all
the potentialities for happiness, for suffering, and for further
volitional activity—from the old being, who is also you
yourself.
From the point of view of continuity, the new being is the same as the
old being (although in another body), for the continuity of the
life-current is not broken in any way by the phase of death and rebirth.
You’ve seen that the moral law of action and reaction, as set
out
in the Buddha-doctrine, states that we each experience happiness and
suffering in exact proportion to the moral and immoral qualities of our
past activities. You’ve seen also that this same doctrine
teaches
that moral and immoral activities build up forces within the mind, and
these forces—reaction-forces, we have called
them—eventually precipitate experiences of happiness and
suffering.
This is perhaps an oversimplification of the matter, for in more exact
terms the Buddha-doctrine says that every cause has a number of
effects, while every effect arises from a number of causes. In other
words, nothing arises from only one cause, and nothing gives rise to
only one effect: everything is interwoven with many other things.
However, the main point is that morally skilful activity brings
enjoyment of some kind in its train while morally unskilful activity
brings suffering.
The concept of the reaction-force enables us to see how the Buddhist
idea of rebirth differs from non-Buddhist beliefs in reincarnation, for
what is reborn in Buddhist teachings is a life-current, not a soul in
the ordinary sense.
This brings us to the matter of the time at which a particular
reaction-force (generated by a specific will-activity) operates. If you
rob a bank and bungle your escape, you’ll be caught
immediately
and soon punished. If you plan your escape well and make a success of
it, but nevertheless leave a few clues, you may not be caught for five
years, but when you are eventually punished you’ll be able to
see
the connection between the cause (your immoral action) and the effect
in the shape of punishment. However, you may execute the robbery and
your escape so well that you will evade suspicion and punishment (a
convenient word in the present context but not a very exact one) may
not come until several lifetimes afterwards. Then you won’t
be
able to see the connection between cause and effect.
Here again we are over-simplifying the position by talking as if one
cause brings about only one effect, but the question at issue is the
time at which a particular reaction-force operates.
As we have already seen, a reaction-force cannot discharge its energy
until the conditions appropriate to its operation are suitable; and by
conditions we mean both the external or environmental conditions as
well as conditions within the mind itself. That means that if you carry
out a morally unskilful activity—such as a
robbery—during a
time when you are reaping the benefits of a past series of morally
skilful actions, you may not reap the adverse effects of the immoral
act until the opposite kind of reaction-force has run its course. You
say you’re enjoying a run of good luck, and this is true
enough
so long as you realize that good luck is really the fruition of past
good activity.
Similarly, if you carry out some act of generosity you can expect the
enjoyment of some sort of happiness as a result, but this may not be in
the near future or even in your present lifetime. You may perhaps be in
the midst of a long period of frustration and failure, the effect of
some past phase of morally unskilful activity whose reaction-force must
run its course and exhaust its energy.
Thus the Buddha-doctrine teaches that some actions are immediately
effective, since their resulting reaction-forces are discharged soon
after their inception; but many will-actions are remotely effective,
for the reaction-forces they generate may not produce their reactions
in terms of happiness or suffering until many lifetimes afterwards.
The effects of weak volitional actions may be neutralized by stronger
reaction-forces of an opposite nature. Thus, if a weak retardant
reaction-force is opposed by a stronger one of a progressant nature,
then the stronger may render the weaker ineffective, losing some of its
own energy in the process.
This does not apply, however, to a strong reaction-force generated by a
very definite morally skilful or a very definite morally unskilful
activity. The reaction-forces built into the mental structure by such
activities can never be neutralized, and even though the suitable
conditions for their discharge don’t arise until many
lifetimes
afterwards, they invariably become effective at some time. They are
therefore called indefinitely effective reaction-forces, and while
dormant they are classed as reserve reaction-forces.
In contrast to indefinitely effective reaction-force, there is a kind
called weighty reaction-force, which is generated either by very
serious retardant will-activity or else by very exalted states of mind.
The operation of weighty reaction-force, the Buddha-doctrine states,
takes precedence over all other kinds.
You can see that, however long may be the time-lag between the cause
and its effect, the end-result of volitional activity is inevitable.
At first sight you might take this to imply that the present and the
future are completely and inflexibly governed by the past, and that you
can experience only what your past actions have determined for you.
This fatalistic view, however, is really not a part of the Buddhist
doctrine of cause and effect. It is true that you are
largely—very largely—influenced by reaction-forces
generated by your past volitional activities, but they are not the only
forces in the mind: there is also the possibility of present volition.
Volition or will exists as a force within the mind, just as attention
and one-pointedness exist as forces within the mind. We’re
not
entering into any discussion on free will, beyond mentioning that
everything we do is conditioned by internal and external factors; but
we must recognize that volition does exist in the sense that it
consists of the force of desire directed towards an objective.
Since volition does exist as desire-force directed towards an
objective, we can see that we can use this volition to handle the
present results of past activity. By "handling" the present results of
past activity I don’t mean that we can cancel these results;
I
mean that we can utilize our present experiences to help us to make
progress, or we can let these same experiences—pleasant as
well
as unpleasant—retard our progress. But to handle our present
experiences—to utilize them as a means of making
progress—we must develop the necessary moral skill.
Although the present is conditioned by the past as the future is
conditioned by the present, the future is not unalterably fixed by the
past, for the future is dependent also on what we do with our present
powers of volition. In many circumstances, it is true that there may be
little or no scope for a constructive or progressant course of action,
for the pressure of reaction-forces from the past may be too great and
the present volition too weak. However, in general, even if you have no
choice of external action, at least it’s possible to regulate
your mental and moral responses to a situation, even to a slight
extent. Thus, under a difficult set of conditions that you are unable
to alter, you can at least exercise patience and tolerance, facing the
situation without allowing it completely to overwhelm you.
In this way, while going through a difficult period of painful
reaction-force results, you’re at least building up within
your
mental structure new progressant reaction-forces, thus using the
situation to its best advantage.
Questions and Answers
about Kamma and Its Fruit
Nina
van Gorkom
I
A. When people have an unpleasant experience they are inclined to ask:
"Why did this have to happen to me?" One might be very good and kind to
other people and yet receive unkind words in return. Could you tell me
whether it is true that good deeds will bring a good result? I
sometimes doubt it.
B. People ask this question because they do not always understand the
reason why they have to suffer in life. It is difficult to know which
cause in the past brings about this or that unpleasant experience at
the present moment. The Buddha said that everything that happens must
have a cause. When we suffer it must have a cause either in the far
past or in the proximate past. If we know how causes and effects in our
lives are interrelated, it will help us to develop the right attitude
towards unpleasant experiences and sorrow.
A. Are the bad deeds one did in the past the cause of unpleasant
experiences at the present moment? The deeds which are already done
belong to the past. How can those deeds bring a result later on?
B. In order to have a deeper understanding of how cause and effect are
interrelated it is necessary to know first what motivates good and bad
deeds; moreover we should know how we accumulate wholesome tendencies
in doing wholesome deeds and how we accumulate unwholesome tendencies
in doing unwholesome deeds.
A. Why do you use the words "wholesome" and "unwholesome" instead of
good and bad?
B. The words "good" and "bad" generally imply a moral judgement. The
Buddha would not judge people as "good" or "bad." He explained about
the conditions for their behaviour and about the effects of
wholesomeness and unwholesomeness. An unwholesome deed is a deed which
brings harm to oneself or to other people, either at the moment the
unwholesome deed is done or later on, whereas a wholesome deed is one
which will lead to happiness. Unwholesome is in Pali akusala, and
wholesome is kusala. With unwholesome mental states or "akusala cittas"
one can perform unwholesome deeds or "akusala kamma"; and with
wholesome mental states or "kusala cittas" one can perform wholesome
deeds or "kusala kamma."
A. What is a citta? Is it a soul or "self" which directs the deeds? Is
it under one’s control whether one will have a kusala citta
which
can perform kusala kamma, or is it beyond control?
B. A citta is not a soul or "self." There are many different cittas
which succeed one another, there is no citta which lasts. Each citta
which arises falls away immediately. We can experience at one moment
that we have an akusala citta. However, this does not last, it falls
away again. At another moment we might experience that we have a kusala
citta; this does not last either, it falls away again. There can only
be one citta at a time; we cannot have an akusala citta at the same
moment as a kusala citta. Cittas replace one another continuously. How
can we take something for self if it does not even last for a second?
It is not in our power to have wholesome cittas whenever we want to.
People would like to be good the whole day but they cannot have kusala
cittas continuously; it is beyond their control.
All cittas are beyond control. We cannot help it that we like certain
people and certain things, and that we dislike other people and things.
We cannot direct all our thoughts, we may be absent-minded although we
do not want to. No two people can have the same thoughts, even if they
think of the same object, for example, of a country where they both
have been. One’s thoughts depend on many conditions, for
example,
on experiences and accumulated tendencies in the past, on the object
which presents itself at the present moment, on good or bad friends, or
on the food one has eaten.
As it is not in one’s power to have a certain citta at a
certain
moment, we cannot say that there is a "self" which directs our deeds.
Our actions depend on the tendencies that have been accumulated in the
past and on many other conditions.
A. I notice that some people always seem to do the wrong thing in life,
whereas for other people it is not difficult to be generous and honest.
What is the reason that people are so different?
B. People are so different because of different tendencies and
inclinations which have been accumulated in the past. People who are
very often angry accumulate anger. When the accumulated anger is strong
enough they will perform akusala kamma through speech or deeds.
Everybody has accumulated both unwholesome and wholesome tendencies.
A. Is it correct that good and bad deeds performed in the past are
never lost, that they continue to have an influence at the present
moment?
B. That is true. Experiences one had in the past, and good and bad
deeds committed in the past, have been accumulated and they condition
cittas arising in the present time. If the citta at the present moment
is akusala citta, there is a new accumulation of unwholesomeness, and
if the citta at the present moment is kusala citta, there is a new
accumulation of wholesomeness.
Therefore cittas which arise are not only conditioned by the object
that presents itself through eyes, ears, nose, tongue, body-sense or
mind, but they are conditioned as well by the tendencies and
inclinations accumulated in the past and by many other factors.
Cittas are beyond control; they are, as the Buddha said, "anattaa."
When the Buddha said that everything is anattaa, he meant that one
cannot have power over anything at all. Everything in our life occurs
because there are conditions, and everything falls away again.
Good deeds and bad deeds which we performed will bring their result
accordingly. The result will take place when it is the right time, when
there are the right conditions for the result to take place. It is not
in anyone’s power to have the result arise at this or at that
moment. Cause and result are beyond control, they are anattaa.
A. I understand that akusala cittas which perform akusala kamma are
cause and that those cannot bring a pleasant result; they will bring an
unpleasant result, whereas kusala cittas which perform kusala kamma
will bring a good result. Each cause will bring its result accordingly.
Could you explain how the result is brought about? Is it a punishment
or a reward for one’s deeds?
B. There is no question of punishment or reward because there is no one
who punishes or rewards. It is the course of nature that one reaps what
one has sown. Accumulated akusala kamma produces at the right time a
citta which experiences an unpleasant object; this citta is the result
of a bad deed one did in the past. Accumulated kusala kamma produces at
the right time a citta which experiences a pleasant object; this citta
is the result of a good deed one did in the past. The citta which is
result is called "vipaakacitta" There will be different results at
different moments. For most people it is not possible to find out which
deed of the past produces the result one receives at the present
moment. However, it is of no use to know in detail what happened in the
past; we should only be concerned about the present moment. It is
enough to know that akusala kamma produces an unpleasant result and
that kusala kamma produces a pleasant result. The result is produced
either shortly afterwards or later on. We cannot blame other people for
an unpleasant result we receive. An unpleasant result is the
consequence of our own bad deeds.
A. How often during the day is there vipaaka? Is there vipaaka at this
moment?
B. Yes, there is vipaaka now, because you are seeing and hearing. Every
time you are seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting, and experiencing a
tangible object through the body-sense there is vipaaka. All
impressions that we experience through the five senses are vipaaka
A. How can I find out whether there is pleasant or unpleasant vipaaka?
I am seeing right now but I have no pleasant or unpleasant feeling
about it.
B. It is not always possible to find out whether the object is pleasant
or unpleasant. When we see or hear we cannot always find out whether
there is kusala vipaaka or akusala vipaaka. When we feel pain or when
we are sick we can be sure that there is akusala vipaaka. The moment of
vipaakacitta is very short, it falls away immediately.
When we see, we experience colour through the eyes. Then we like or
dislike it, we recognize it, we think about it. The seeing of colour is
vipaaka. Like or dislike and thinking about the object are not vipaaka.
Those functions are performed by other cittas, which are akusala cittas
or kusala cittas. The cittas that like or dislike, and the cittas that
think about the object, are not results but causes; they can motivate
deeds which will bring fresh results.
All cittas succeed one another so rapidly that there seems to be only
one citta. We are inclined to think that like or dislike and thinking
are still vipaaka, but that is a delusion.
A. Does everyone receive both akusala vipaaka and kusala vipaaka?
B. Everyone has accumulated both unwholesome deeds and wholesome deeds,
therefore everyone will receive both akusala vipaaka and kusala
vipaaka. However, we can develop understanding of cause and effect and
this helps us to be patient, even under unpleasant conditions. For
instance, when we understand what vipaaka is we will be less inclined
to feel sorry for ourselves or to blame other people when there is
akusala vipaaka. If we feel sorry for ourselves or blame other people,
there is a new accumulation of unwholesomeness and this will bring us
more sorrow in the future.
A. But I cannot help disliking unpleasant vipaaka. How can I change my
attitude?
B. You can change your attitude by understanding what is vipaaka and
what is no longer vipaaka. It is very important to know that the moment
we feel dislike or regret is not the same as the moment of vipaaka.
People are inclined to think that the dislike which arises after the
vipaaka is still vipaaka. When they say "This is just vipaaka," they do
not distinguish unpleasant feelings from the moments of vipaaka. If
they do not really know what is vipaaka and what is not vipaaka but
akusala citta, or akusala kamma, they accumulate unwholesomeness all
through their lives. By ignorance, by not knowing when the citta is
akusala, one accumulates unwholesomeness.
A. I am inclined to blame people who speak harsh words to me, even when
I am so kind to them. Are those people not the cause that I receive
unpleasant vipaaka?
B. We are inclined to think in this way if we haven’t yet
understood what vipaaka is.
Let us analyse what is really happening when we hear harsh words spoken
by someone else. When those words are produced by akusala cittas, it is
an unpleasant object we receive through the ear. It is not really we
who receive the unpleasant object, but the vipaakacitta receives the
unpleasant object through the ear. The vipaakacitta is the result of
akusala kamma performed in the past. This was the right moment that the
akusala kamma, performed in the past, caused vipaakacittas to arise at
the present moment. The person who speaks harsh words to us is not the
cause of akusala vipaaka; the cause is within ourselves. Someone who
speaks harsh words to us is only one of the many conditions for
vipaakacittas to arise. Our own accumulated akusala kamma is the real
cause of akusala vipaaka.
A. It seems to me that kamma is a fate which directs our lives.
B. Kamma is not an unchangeable fate outside ourselves, but our own
accumulated unwholesome and wholesome deeds, and at the right moment it
will produce its results in the form of vipaakacittas.
A. If a third person would pass and if he would hear harsh words spoken
to me, he might have akusala vipaaka as well, although the words are
not directed to him. Is that right?
B. If it is the right moment for him to have akusala vipaaka, he will
receive the unpleasant object as well; he might have akusala vipaaka
through the ear. Whether the words are addressed to him or to someone
else does not make any difference.
A. Is it right that the vipaaka might not be as unpleasant for him as
for the person to whom the harsh words are addressed?
B. Is it necessary to have aversion every time we hear an unpleasant
sound?
A. No, it is not necessary.
B. Aversion has nothing to do with vipaaka. Considering whether the
words are addressed to oneself or to another person and the unpleasant
feelings about it are no longer vipaaka. If we feel aversion there are
akusala cittas, conditioned by our accumulations of aversion in the
past. There are some short moments of vipaaka only at the moment we
receive the sound, before the unpleasant feelings arise. Kamma
conditioned the vipaakacittas right at that moment. Kamma is the real
cause of vipaaka, not this or that person. If we want to have the right
understanding of vipaaka, we should not think in terms of "I," "those
people" and "harsh words." If we think of people and if we consider
whether harsh words are addressed to ourselves or to someone else, we
will not see the truth. If we think in terms of cittas and if we
understand conditions for cittas, we will understand reality. When
someone speaks harsh words it is conditioned by his accumulated
aversion. It is not really important whether he addresses those words
to us or to someone else.
If we understand vipaaka we will take the unpleasant experiences of
life less seriously. It will be of much help to us and to other people
if we try to understand ourselves, if we know different cittas arising
at different moments. After we have had akusala vipaaka we should try
not to think much about it. When we think about vipaaka it already
belongs to the past. It is therefore better to forget about it
immediately.
A. I still do not understand why I have to receive harsh words in
return for my kindness. How can the result of kusala kamma be akusala
vipaaka?
B. This could never happen. Kusala kamma has kusala vipaaka as its
result; however, the good result might arise later on. It is not
possible to tell at which moments akusala kamma and kusala kamma
produce results. Akusala vipaaka is not the result of one’s
kindness; it is the result of one’s accumulated akusala
kamma.
Kindness will certainly bring a good result, but that might take place
later on.
A. I cannot help feeling sorry for myself when there is akusala
vipaaka. What can I do to prevent the accumulation of more
unwholesomeness?
B. When there are conditions for akusala cittas we cannot prevent their
arising. They arise very closely after the vipaaka, before we know it.
They are "anattaa," they do not belong to a "self." However, we can
develop more understanding of the different phenomena that arise. The
akusala cittas that arise after the vipaaka are not the same as the
vipaakacittas and they have conditions different from the conditions
for the vipaakacittas.
If we understand that feeling sorry for ourselves and blaming other
people is done by akusala cittas and that in this way we accumulate
more unwholesomeness, we will be less inclined to do so. If we
understand that at this moment we cannot do anything about the vipaaka
which has its cause in the past, we will be able to forget about it
more easily. At the moment we are aware of akusala vipaaka, it has
fallen away already and belongs to the past.
Life is too short to waste energy in worrying about things of the past.
It is better to accumulate kusala kamma by doing wholesome deeds.
We read in the Kindred Sayings (Sa.myutta Nikaaya I, Sagaathaa Vagga,
Ch. III, Kosala, 111, §5) that King Pasenadi came to see the
Buddha at Saavatthi. The king had been zealously busy with all such
matters as occupy kings. The Buddha asked him what he would do if he
would hear from loyal men, coming from all four directions, about a
great mountain, high as the sky, moving along and crushing every living
thing. The Buddha said:
"And you, sire, seized with mighty dread, the destruction of human life
so terrible, rebirth as man so hard to obtain, what is there that you
could do?"
"In such a mighty peril, lord, the destruction of human life so
terrible, rebirth as man so hard to obtain, what else could I do save
to live righteously and justly and work good and meritorious deeds?"
"I tell you, sire, I make known to you sire: old age and death come
rolling in upon you, sire! Since old age and death are rolling in upon
you, sire, what is there that you can do?"
"Since old age and death, lord, are rolling in upon me, what else can I
do save to live righteously and justly, and to work good and
meritorious deeds?"
II
A.
I
understand that the active side of our life consists of unwholesome
states of mind or akusala cittas and wholesome states of mind or kusala
cittas. Akusala cittas can perform unwholesome deeds and kusala cittas
can perform wholesome deeds. All through one’s life one
accumulates both unwholesomeness and wholesomeness.
There are other cittas which are the result of one’s deeds:
those
are called vipaakacittas. The result of unwholesome deeds or akusala
kamma is akusala vipaaka; the result of wholesome deeds or kusala kamma
is kusala vipaaka. Vipaaka is the passive side of our life; we undergo
vipaaka. Seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting and feeling through body
contact are vipaaka.
I can understand this because sense-impressions are impressions which
one undergoes. The cittas which think about those impressions, and
which like or dislike them, are no longer result or vipaaka; they are
cause. They are akusala or kusala cittas. But I still doubt every time
I see there is the result of akusala or kusala kamma I did in the past.
Can you prove this to me?
B. This cannot be proven in theory. One can know the truth only through
direct experience.
There are three kinds of wisdom. The first kind stems from thinking
about the realities of life such as impermanence, old age, sickness and
death. The second kind is understanding developed through the study of
the Buddhist teachings. The third kind of wisdom is the direct
experience of the truth.
The first and the second kind of wisdom are necessary, but they are
still theoretical understanding; they are not yet the realization of
the truth. If one accepts the Buddha’s teachings because they
seem to be reasonable, or if one accepts them on the authority of the
Buddha, one will not have the clear understanding that stems from the
direct experience of the truth. Only this kind of understanding can
eliminate all doubts.
We read in the Gradual Sayings (A"nguttara Nikaaya, Book of the Threes,
Ch. VII, §65, Those of Kesaputta) that when the Buddha was
staying
in Kesaputta the Kaalaamas came to see him. They had heard different
views expounded by different people and had doubts as to who was
speaking the truth and who falsehood. The Buddha said:
"Now look you, Kaalaamas. Be not misled by report or tradition or
hearsay. Be not misled by proficiency in the collections, nor by mere
logic or inference, nor after considering reasons, nor after reflection
on and approval of some theory, nor because it fits becoming, nor out
of respect for a recluse (who holds it). But, Kaalaamas, when you know
for yourselves: These things are unprofitable, these things are
blameworthy, these things are censured by the intelligent; these
things, when performed and undertaken, conduce to loss and
sorrow—then indeed do you reject them, Kaalaamas."
The Buddha then asked the Kaalaamas whether greed, malice and delusion,
and the evil deeds they inspire, lead to a man’s profit or to
his
loss. The Kaalaamas answered that they lead to his loss. The Buddha
then repeated that when they know for themselves that these things are
unprofitable and lead to sorrow, they should reject them. Thereupon the
Buddha spoke about non-greed, non-hate and non-delusion, and the
abstinence from evil deeds these inspire. He said that when the
Kaalaamas know for themselves that these things are profitable and
conduce to happiness, they should undertake them.
We have to find out the truth ourselves, by experiencing it in daily
life. In being aware of all realities of daily life one develops the
third kind of wisdom.
In the practice of vipassanaa or "insight," we learn to understand all
realities of daily life, in being aware of them at the moment they
occur. We learn to be aware of what happens at the present moment. We
will know what seeing, hearing, thinking, etc., really are if we are
aware of those realities at the moment they occur. Only the present
moment can give us the truth, not the past or the future. We cannot
experience now the cittas we had in the past; we cannot experience the
cittas which performed akusala kamma or kusala kamma in the past. We
can only experience cittas of the present moment. We can experience
that some cittas are akusala, some are kusala, and some are neither,
that they have different functions. If we learn to experience the
cittas of the present moment, we will gradually be able to see
realities more clearly. If we realize enlightenment, or the experience
of Nibbaana, all doubts about realities will be eliminated. Then we
will see the truth.
A. I would like to be enlightened in order to know the truth.
B. If you only have wishful thinking about Nibbaana, you will never
attain it. The path leading to Nibbaana is knowing the present moment.
Only if we know the present moment will we be able to eliminate
ignorance about realities and the idea of "self" to which we are still
clinging. We should not cling to a result which might take place in the
future. We should instead try to know the present moment.
A. Is it not possible for me to know whether seeing and hearing at this
moment is akusala vipaaka or kusala vipaaka?
B. Sometimes you can find out. For instance, hearing is kusala vipaaka
when the sound is produced by kusala cittas. Someone who speaks to you
with compassion, produces the sound with kusala cittas. When you hear
that sound there is kusala vipaaka. Often it is not possible for us to
know whether there is akusala vipaaka or kusala vipaaka. Moreover, it
is not of great use to know this, because we cannot do anything about
our own vipaaka.
It is enough to know that akusala kamma brings about akusala vipaaka,
and that kusala kamma brings about kusala vipaaka. It is important to
remember that vipaaka is caused by our own kamma, that the cause of
vipaaka is within ourselves and not outside ourselves.
The Gradual Sayings (A"nguttara Nikaaya, Book of the Threes, Ch. IV,
§35, The Lord of Death) tells of a man who had been negligent
in
the doing of good deeds, and was brought before Yama, the lord of
death. Yama said to him:
"My good man, it was through negligence that you did not act nobly in
deed, word and thought. Verily they shall do unto you in accordance
with your negligence. That evil action of yours was not done by mother,
father, brother, sister, friends and comrades: not by kinsmen, devas,
recluses and brahmins. By yourself alone was it done. It is just you
that will experience the fruit thereof."
It is not important to know exactly at which moment there is akusala
vipaaka or kusala vipaaka. However, it is most important to know
exactly at which moments there is vipaaka and at which moments we
perform akusala kamma or kusala kamma. The moments we perform akusala
kamma and kusala kamma will condition our future.
A. In order to know how and when one accumulates akusala kamma and
kusala kamma one should know more about the cittas which perform kamma.
I notice that the Buddha spoke about cittas in order to help people to
have more understanding about their life and in order to encourage them
to perform kusala kamma. Therefore I think that all through
one’s
life one should develop a clear understanding about cittas. Could you
give me a definition of a citta ?
B. It is not possible to give a definition that will explain to you
what a citta is. You should experience cittas yourself in order to know
them. There are so many different types of cittas at different moments
that it is impossible to give one definition for all of them. The most
general definition is: it knows something. Citta is not like
materiality, which does not know anything. The citta which sees knows
colour, a citta which hears knows sound, a citta which thinks knows
many different objects.
A. Why are seeing and hearing cittas? You explained before that seeing
is not thinking, but only the experience of colour through eye-sense
and that hearing is the experience of sound through ear-sense. Are
those not merely physical processes instead of cittas which know
something?
B. Eye-sense and ear-sense in themselves are not cittas, they are
physical organs. But eye-sense and ear-sense are conditions for the
arising of cittas. There is citta whenever an object, as for example
colour or sound, is experienced. We should try to be aware of the citta
of the present moment if we want to know what citta is. We should be
aware of the seeing or the hearing that occurs right now.
Many people who are brought up in the West do not understand why it is
not possible to give a clear definition of citta, and of everything the
Buddha taught. They want to prove things in theory. This is not the way
to find the truth. One should experience the truth in order to know it.
A. I still think of citta as a mind which directs seeing, hearing,
thinking, etc. How can I find out that there is not a "self" which
directs everything?
B. We can only find this out by being aware of different cittas. Thus
we will experience that we cannot direct our thoughts. We are
absent-minded when we do not want to be so, many odd thoughts arise, in
spite of ourselves. Where is the self that can direct our thoughts?
There is one citta at a time; it arises and falls away completely, to
be followed by the next citta, which is no longer the same. There is no
single citta which stays. For example, seeing-consciousness is one
citta, but hearing-consciousness is another citta.
A. I don’t understand why those functions are performed by
different cittas. Why can’t there be one citta which stays
and
performs different functions, and why is it not possible that different
functions are performed at the same time? I can see, hear and think at
the same time.
B. Seeing occurs if colour contacts the eye-sense. Recognizing it or
thinking about it occurs afterwards. Seeing is not performed by the
same cittas as thinking about what one saw; seeing has different
conditions. Hearing has again different conditions. Thinking about what
one heard has conditions that are different from the conditions for
hearing-consciousness.
You would not be able to notice that seeing and hearing are different
if those functions were performed by one single citta at the same time.
In that case you would only receive one impression instead of several
impressions. We experience seeing and hearing as different impressions,
even when they seem to occur at the same time. They have different
places of origin and different objects, and they occur at different
moments, though the moments can be so close that they seem to be one.
Thinking about what one just saw occurs after the seeing-consciousness,
thinking about what one just heard occurs after the
hearing-consciousness. Seeing-consciousness occurs at a moment
different from the moment the hearing-consciousness occurs. Therefore
thinking about what one saw cannot arise at the same moment as thinking
about what one heard. Thinking is done by many different cittas which
succeed one another.
When we have learned to be more keenly aware of the citta which arises
at the present moment, we will notice that seeing and hearing arise
alternately, at different moments. We will notice that there
isn’t one long moment of thinking, but different moments of
thinking.
We will notice that thinking is very often interrupted by moments of
seeing and hearing, and these again are conditions for new thoughts. We
will find out how much our thoughts depend on different experiences of
the past, on unwholesome and wholesome tendencies we have accumulated,
on the objects we see and hear and on many other conditions.
A. You said that all cittas are beyond control, that they are
"anattaa." Akusala cittas and kusala cittas are conditioned by
one’s accumulations. It is not in anyone’s power
that they
arise. You said that vipaakacittas are "anattaa" as well.
Sometimes it seems that I can have power over vipaaka, that it is in my
power to have kusala vipaaka through the ear. Whenever I wish to hear a
pleasant sound, I can put a record of classical music on my
record-player.
B. You put the record on because you know the conditions for the
pleasant sound. Everything happens when there are the right conditions
for it. It is impossible for anything to happen without conditions.
When there is fire we use water to extinguish it. We cannot order the
fire to be extinguished. We don’t have to tell the water to
extinguish the fire; the water has the characteristic that it can
extinguish the fire. Without the right conditions we would not be able
to do anything.
With regard to the beautiful music which you can play, there have to be
many different conditions for this pleasant sound. And even when there
is this pleasant sound, you have no power over the kusala
vipaakacittas. If you really could direct them, you could make them
arise at any moment, even without the record-player. We should remember
that music is not vipaaka, only the cittas which experience the
pleasant object through the ear are vipaaka. Do we really have power
over these cittas?
There are many conditions which have to cooperate so that the vipaaka
can arise. There has to be ear-sense. Did you create your own
ear-sense? You received ear-sense before you were born; this also is a
result for which you did not ask. Moreover, do you think that you can
have kusala vipaaka as long as you wish and whenever you wish? When you
have developed a keener awareness you will notice that the kusala
vipaaka and the other types of cittas arise alternately.
The vipaakacittas are followed by cittas which are no longer vipaaka,
for example, the cittas which arise when you like the music which you
hear and when you think about it. Or there might be cittas which think
about many different things, perhaps with aversion or with worry. Or
there might be thoughts of kindness towards other people.
The kusala vipaaka will not only be interrupted by akusala cittas and
kusala cittas, but by akusala vipaaka as well. There is akusala vipaaka
when there are loud noises outside, when the telephone rings loudly, or
when one feels the sting of a mosquito. There cannot be kusala vipaaka
at the moment there is an akusala citta, a kusala citta or akusala
vipaaka.
If you could make kusala vipaaka arise at will, you could have it
without interruption, whenever you wish. This is not possible.
Moreover, if it were not the right time for you to have any kusala
vipaaka, you would not be able to receive a pleasant object: the
record-player would be broken, or something else would happen so that
you could not have kusala vipaaka.
A. Is it not by accident that the record-player would be broken?
B. The Buddha taught that everything happens because of conditions.
There are no accidents. You will understand reality more deeply if you
think of cittas, and if you do not think of conventional terms like
record-player, this person or that person. Vipaaka are the cittas, not
the record-player or the sound in itself. The record-player is only one
of the many conditions for vipaaka. The real cause of vipaaka is not an
accident, or a cause outside ourselves; the real cause is within
ourselves.
Can you find another cause for akusala vipaaka but your own akusala
kamma, and for kusala vipaaka but your own kusala kamma?
A. That is right, I can find no other cause. However, I still do not
understand how akusala cittas which performed akusala kamma in the past
and kusala cittas which performed kusala kamma in the past can produce
vipaaka later on.
B. It is not possible to understand how the events of our life are
interrelated without studying cittas in detail and without knowing and
experiencing the cittas which arise at the present moment. When one can
experience what the cittas of the present moment really are, one will
be able to understand more about the past.
When the Buddha became enlightened he saw how everything that happens
in life has many conditions and he saw how things that happen depend on
one another.
The teaching about the conditional arising of phenomena, the dependent
origination (pa.ticca-samuppaada), is difficult to grasp. We read in
the Kindred Sayings (Sa.myutta Nikaaya I, Sagaathaa Vagga, Ch. VI, The
Brahmaa Suttas, Ch. 1, §1, The Entreaty) that the Buddha, when
he
was staying at Uruvela after he had just attained enlightenment, was
thinking that the Dhamma he had penetrated was deep, difficult to
understand:
And
for a race devoting itself to the things to which it clings, devoted
thereto, delighting therein, this were a matter hard to perceive, to
wit, that this is conditioned by that—that all that happens
is by
way of cause.
At
first
the Buddha had no inclination to teach Dhamma, as he knew that a
teaching which is "against the stream of common thought" would not be
accepted by people who delight in clinging. The sutta continues:
"This that through many toils I’ve won,
Enough! Why should I make it known?
By folk with lust and hate consumed
Not this a Dhamma that can be grasped.
Against the stream (of common thought),
Deep, subtle, fine, and hard to see,
Unseen it will be by passion’s slaves,
Cloaked in the murk (of ignorance)."
However,
the Buddha decided out of compassion to teach Dhamma, for the sake of
those who would be able to understand it. Do you still have doubts
about the accumulation of deeds?
A. Is the deed you see a mental phenomenon or a physical phenomenon?
B. You can only see the action of the body, but the action is actually
performed by cittas. We can never see the citta, but we can find out
what the citta is like when the body moves in doing deeds. With regard
to your question how deeds done in the past can produce a result later
on, the answer is that deeds are performed by cittas. They are
mentality and thus they can be accumulated. All experiences and deeds
of the past are accumulated in each citta, which falls away and
conditions the next citta. Whenever there is the right condition the
kamma that is accumulated and carried on from one moment of citta to
the next can produce vipaaka.
III
A.
I would like to know if we only receive vipaaka in this life, or is
there vipaaka in a future life as well?
B. According to the Buddhist teachings one receives the results of
one’s deeds in future lives as well. We read in the Kindred
Sayings (Sa.myutta Nikaaya I, Ch. III, Kosala, 2, §10,
Childless
2) that when the Buddha was staying at Saavatthi, King Pasenadi came to
see him. A rich man who had lived as a miser had just died. He had
performed both good deeds and bad deeds and he therefore had to receive
both kusala vipaaka and akusala vipaaka, which he experienced during
different lifespans. He had given alms to a "Silent Buddha"l of a
former period, but afterwards he regretted his gift. As a result of his
good deed of almsgiving to a Silent Buddha he was reborn seven times in
heaven, where he could enjoy pleasant vipaaka. After his existences in
heaven he was reborn as a human being, which is kusala vipaaka as well.
He was born from rich parents, but his accumulation of stinginess
prevented him from enjoying the pleasant things of life. Because he
regretted his gift to the Silent Buddha, as a result he did not utilize
his riches for himself or for others.
After his existence as a human being he was again bound for a different
rebirth. He had committed akusala kamma of a heavy kind and this
akusala kamma would bring akusala vipaaka of a heavy kind. He had
killed the only son of his brother because he wanted to get his
brother’s fortune. This very heavy kamma caused him to be
reborn
in hell where he would stay for many hundred thousands of years. The
sutta points out how one can receive different results in different
existences.
A. Is the existence of heavens and hells not mere mythology?
B. People have different accumulated inclinations which make them
perform different kamma. No person acts in the same way as another.
Each act brings its own result, either in this life or in the following
existences. To be reborn in a heavenly plane or in the human plane is
the result of a wholesome deed, to be reborn in a sorrowful plane is
the result of an unwholesome deed. Heaven and hell are conventional
terms which are used to explain realities. They explain the nature of
the vipaaka which is caused by kamma. Since both akusala kamma and
kusala kamma have different degrees, akusala vipaaka and kusala vipaaka
must have different degrees as well.
Names are given to different heavenly planes and different sorrowful
planes in order to point out the different degrees of akusala vipaaka
and kusala vipaaka. Deva, which means "radiant being," is a name given
to those who are born in heavenly planes. In the Anuruddha Sutta
(Middle Length Sayings III, No. 127) Anuruddha spoke about different
degrees of skill in meditation which bring their results accordingly. A
monk who was not advanced was reborn as a deva "with tarnished light."
Those who were more advanced in meditation were reborn as devas with a
greater radiance. There are different devas with different degrees of
brightness.
A. I find it difficult to believe in devas and in different planes of
existence.
B. You do not experience devas and different planes of existence right
at this moment. But is it right to reject what you cannot experience
yet? If one has right understanding of the cittas of the present moment
one will be able to understand more about the past and about the future.
Rebirth-consciousness can arise in any plane of existence. When the
right conditions are present a good or a bad deed which has been
accumulated can produce a result, it can produce rebirth-consciousness
in the appropriate plane.
A. What is the first vipaaka in this life?
B. There has to be a citta at the very first moment of life. Without a
citta we cannot have life. A dead body has no citta, it is not alive.
What type of citta would be the first citta? Would it be an akusala
citta or a kusala citta, thus a type of citta which could bring a
result? Or would it be another type of citta, for example, a citta
which is not a cause but a result, a vipaakacitta?
A. I think it must be a vipaakacitta. To be born is a result; nobody
asks to be born. Why are people born with such different characters and
in such different situations? Are the parents the only cause of birth
and the only cause of the character of a child?
B. Parents are only one of the conditions for the body of a child, but
they are not the only condition.
A. What about the character of a child? Are there not certain
tendencies in a child’s character he inherits from his
parents?
Is this not proved by science?
B. The character of a child cannot be explained by the character of the
parents. Brothers and sisters and even twins can be very different. One
child likes to study, another child is lazy; one child is by nature
cheerful, another depressed. Parents may have influence on a
child’s character after its birth in that education, a
cultural
pattern or a family tradition in which a child is brought up will be
conditions for cittas to arise. But a child does not inherit its
character from its parents. The differentiations in character are
caused by accumulations of experiences from previous existences as well.
A. Are parents not the real cause of birth?
B. Parents are only one of the conditions for birth; kamma is the real
cause of birth. A deed, done in the past, brings its result when it is
the right time: it can produce the vipaakacitta which is
rebirth-consciousness. We read in the "Discourse on the Lesser Analysis
of Deeds" (Middle Length Sayings III, No. 135) that, when the Buddha
was staying near Saavatthi in the Jeta Grove, Subha came to see him and
said:
"Now, good Gotama, what is the cause, what the reason that lowness and
excellence are to be seen among human beings while they are in human
form? For, good Gotama, human beings of short life-span are to be seen
and those of long life-span; those of many and those of few illnesses;
those who are ugly, those who are beautiful; those who are of little
account, those who are of great account; those who are poor, those who
are wealthy; those who are of lowly families, those of high families;
those who are weak in wisdom, those who are full of wisdom. Now what,
good Gotama, is the cause, what the reason that lowness and excellence
are to be seen among human beings while they are in human form?"
"Deeds are one’s own, brahman youth, beings are heirs to
deeds,
deeds are matrix, deeds are kin, deeds are arbiters. Deed divides
beings, that is to say by lowness and excellence."
A. Is rebirth in a human plane the same as reincarnation?
B. If there were reincarnation, a soul or "self" would continue to
exist and it would take on another body in the next life. However,
there is no soul or "self." There are cittas which succeed one another
from birth to death, from this life to the next life. One citta has
completely fallen away when the next citta arises. There can be only
one citta at a time, and there is no citta which lasts.
Cittas arise and fall away completely, succeeding one another. Death is
the conventional word for the end of one’s lifespan on a
plane of
existence, but actually there is birth and death at each moment of
one’s life, when a citta arises and falls away. There
isn’t
any citta one can take for a soul or "self." Since there is no soul or
"self" in this life, how could there be a soul or "self" which is
reborn in the next life? The last citta of this life is the
dying-consciousness. The dying-consciousness arises and falls away, and
it is succeeded by the rebirth-consciousness of the next life. The
rebirth-consciousness is conditioned by the previous citta, the
dying-consciousness, but it is not the same citta.
A. I can see tendencies in people’s character which seem to
be
the same all through their lives. Moreover, there is rebirth in the
next life. Therefore there must be continuity in life. However, I do
not understand how there can be continuity if each citta completely
falls away before the next citta arises.
B. There is continuity because each citta conditions the next citta and
thus accumulated tendencies can be carried on from one moment to the
next moment. All accumulations of past existences and of the present
life condition future existences.
When people asked the Buddha whether it is the same person who is
reborn or another person, the Buddha answered that it is neither the
same person nor another person. There is nobody who stays the same, not
even in this life, because there is no "self." On the other hand, it is
not another person who is reborn, because there is continuity. Former
existences condition this life, and this life also conditions the
following lives.
A. What is the last vipaaka in this life?
B. The dying-consciousness (cuti-citta) is the last vipaaka in this
life.
Since there are many deeds which have not yet produced a result, one of
the deeds will produce rebirth-consciousness after death. As long as
there is kamma there will be vipaaka, continuing on and on. There will
be future lives, so that the results of one’s deeds can be
received.
When the dying-consciousness falls away, a deed of the past, or kamma,
immediately produces a vipaakacitta: the rebirth-consciousness of the
next life. When the dying-consciousness has fallen away, the
rebirth-consciousness follows upon it immediately, and thus all that
has been accumulated is carried on from the past into the next life.
A. What causes the rebirth-consciousness of the next life?
B. Everyone has performed akusala kamma and kusala kamma. Each deed
brings its own result. The vipaakacitta which is the
rebirth-consciousness can therefore only be the result of one deed, of
akusala kamma or of kusala kamma.
A. Is birth in the human plane the result of kusala kamma?
B. Birth in the human plane is always the result of kusala kamma.
Akusala vipaaka which arises afterwards in life is the result of kamma
that is different from the good deed that produced the
rebirth-consciousness. After birth in the human plane there can be many
moments of akusala vipaaka, every time one experiences an unpleasant
object through one of the five senses. Those moments are the result of
other unwholesome deeds performed in the past.
If the rebirth-consciousness is akusala vipaaka one cannot be born as a
human being. The rebirth has to take place in another plane of
existence, such as the animal world or one of the woeful planes like
the hells or the ghost realm.
A. Can a human being be reborn as an animal?
B. Some people behave like animals, how could they be reborn as human
beings? Everyone will receive the result of his deeds accordingly.
A. Is it due to one’s kamma that one is born in favourable
circumstances, for instance, in a royal family or in a rich family?
B. Yes, this is due to a wholesome deed performed in the past.
A. I notice that even people who are born in the same circumstances, as
for example in rich families, are very different. Some rich people are
generous, others are stingy. How could this be explained?
B. People are different because they have different accumulated
inclinations and tendencies which cause them to behave in different
ways. We read in the sutta that I quoted above about the person who was
born from rich parents, but who could not enjoy the pleasant things of
life because of his accumulated stinginess. Although he had the
opportunity to let other people share in his fortune he did not want to
do this. Other people again who have received pleasant things in life
grasp every opportunity to give things away to others. The different
inclinations people have accumulated condition them to do unwholesome
deeds which will bring them unpleasant results, or to do wholesome
deeds which will bring them pleasant results. People take different
attitudes towards vipaaka. The attitude one takes towards vipaaka is
more important than vipaaka itself, because one’s attitude
conditions one’s life in the future.
A. Can kusala vipaaka be a condition for happiness?
B. The things which are pleasant for the five senses cannot guarantee
true and lasting happiness. Rich people who have everything that is
pl